Desafíos y Oportunidades de Ingeniería de Requerimientos asistida por LLM y Prompt Engineering
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
En el campo del desarrollo de software, la ingeniería de requisitos y la interacción con modelos de lenguaje como ChatGPT están ganando cada vez más relevancia. Este estudio explora la intersección entre los requerimientos de software y las técnicas de prompt engineering utilizadas con ChatGPT. A través de un mapeo sistemático de la literatura, se identifican los principales desafíos y oportunidades en la aplicación de ChatGPT para la elicitación, análisis y gestión de requerimientos. Los resultados destacan la importancia de desarrollar prompts efectivos para obtener información precisa y relevante de ChatGPT en el contexto de la ingeniería de requisitos.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalles del artículo
Sección
Referencias
T. Mahbub, D. Dghaym, A. Shankarnarayanan, T. Syed, S. Shapsough and I. Zualkernan, "Can GPT-4 aid in detecting ambiguities, inconsistencies, and incompleteness in requirements analysis? A comprehensive case study.," in IEEE Access, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3464242.
Marques, N., Silva, R. R., & Bernardino, J. (2024). Using ChatGPT in Software Requirements Engineering: A Comprehensive Review. Future Internet, 16(6), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16060180
Marr, B. A Short History of ChatGPT: How We Got to Where We Are Today. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/05/19/a-short-history-of-chatgpt-how-we-got-to-where-we-are-today/?sh=454c1d75674f (accessed on 1 March 2024).
Sommerville, I., & Sawyer, P. (1997). Requirements engineering: a good practice guide. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
P. Liu, W. Yuan, J. Fu, Z. Jiang, H. Hayashi, and G. Neubig, “Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1–35, 2023.
Arvidsson, S. (2023). Prompt engineering guidelines for LLMs in Requirements Engineering. University of Gothenburg/Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
J. White, Q. Fu, S. Hays, et al., “A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11382, 2023.
Guido Tebes, Denis Peppino, Pablo Becker y Luis Olsina, “Proceso para Revisión Sistemática de Literatura y Mapeo Sistemático”.
Kimya Khakzad Shahandashti, Mithila Sivakumar, Mohammad Mahdi Mohajer, Alvine Boaye Belle, Song Wang, and Timothy Lethbridge. 2024. Assessing the Impact of GPT-4 Turbo in Generating Defeaters for Assurance Cases. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM First International Conference on AI Foundation Models and Software Engineering (FORGE '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3650105.3652291
Scott Barnett, Stefanus Kurniawan, Srikanth Thudumu, Zach Brannelly, and Mohamed Abdelrazek. 2024. Seven Failure Points When Engineering a Retrieval Augmented Generation System. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 3rd International Conference on AI Engineering - Software Engineering for AI (CAIN '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1145/3644815.3644945
Fei Wang, XueFeng Xi, ZhiMing Cui, Huan Dai, and XinYu Wang. 2025. Embedding Traceability in Large Language Model Code Generation: Towards Trustworthy AI-Augmented Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE Companion '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1760–1763. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696630.3730569.
Frank P.-W. Lo, Jianing Qiu, Zeyu Wang, Junhong Chen, Bo Xiao, Wu Yuan, Senior Member, IEEE, Stamatia Giannarou, Gary Frost and Benny Lo, Senior Member, IEEE, “Dietary Assessment with Multimodal ChatGPT: A Systematic Analysis”. Acceso desde IEEE Xplore 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3417280:
Souvick Das, Novarun Deb, Nabendu Chaki, and Agostino Cortesi. 2025. A Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Regulatory Compliance Checking of Software Requirements. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. Just Accepted (December 2025). https://doi.org/10.1145/3785472
Denis Donadel, Francesco Marchiori, Luca Pajola, Mauro Conti, Spritz Matter Srl;. Can LLMs Understand Computer Networks? Towards a Virtual System Administrator”, revisado en IEEE Xplore, DOI: 10.1109/LCN60385.2024.10639641.
Tor Sporsem and Rasmus Ulfsnes. 2025. Towards Requirements Engineering for RAG Systems. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 782–788. https://doi.org/10.1145/3756681.3757040
C. Arora, J. Grundy, and M. Abdelrazek, “Advancing requirements engineering through generative ai: Assessing the role of llms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13976, 2023.
Jiawei Shao, Jingwen Tong, Qiong Wu, Wei Guo, Zijian Li, Zehong Lin, Jun Zhang. “WirelessLLM: Empowering Large Language Models Towards Wireless Intelligence”. Acceso desde IEEE Xplore, DOI: 10.23919/JCIN.2024.10582827
Daeseung Park1, Gi-taek An2, Chayapol Kamyod3, and Cheong Ghil Kim1,∗ “A Study on Performance Improvement of Prompt Engineering for Generative AI with a Large Language Model” Consultado en IEEE Xplore,, DOI: 10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2285.
Toufique Ahmed, Kunal Suresh Pai, Premkumar Devanbu, Earl T. Barr, “Automatic Semantic Augmentation of Language Model Prompts (for Code Summarization)”. 2024 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), revisado en IEEE Xplore: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10548617